Augment Code Intent vs Microsoft Agent 365

Augment Code Intent edges out Microsoft Agent 365 by 0.5 points (8.0 vs 7.5) -- a A-tier vs B-tier split that's narrow but real. Not a blowout; both belong on a shortlist. The score gap shows up most clearly in the categories that matter for Augment Code Intent's strengths, so if those categories are your priority, the lead translates.

Neither tool offers a free tier. Augment Code Intent starts at Included in Auggie subscription, Microsoft Agent 365 at $15. Plan to budget for whichever you pick. The cheap tier usually caps out faster than buyers expect, so look at what the entry plan actually includes -- both vendors have raised list prices in 2026 and the limits are where most of the cost surprise lives.

By use case: pick Augment Code Intent when engineering teams already using augment code's auggie or running mixed claude-code + codex workflows who want higher-level orchestration than writing langgraph graphs from scratch. Pick Microsoft Agent 365 when enterprise it and security teams running mixed-ai environments who need a single pane of glass over local agents (openclaw, copilot cli, claude code), copilot studio agents, and cloud agents in aws bedrock / google cloud / azure. The two tools aren't fighting for the same person -- they're aiming at adjacent jobs that occasionally overlap. If you're squarely in Augment Code Intent's lane, the tier-list ranking and the use-case fit point the same direction; if you're in Microsoft Agent 365's lane, the score gap matters less than the fit.

Bottom line: Augment Code Intent is the safer default for most readers, but Microsoft Agent 365 is competitive enough that the tie-breaker is your specific workload, not the spec sheet.