Google Antigravity vs Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Google Antigravity
Google's agent-first AI IDE -- deploys up to 5 autonomous coding agents in parallel on a VS Code fork
Powered by Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model)
Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0
Microsoft's MIT-licensed open-source agent orchestration framework -- GA on 2026-04-03. Merges Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into a single SDK. Python and .NET. Native MCP and A2A protocol support. Connectors for Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Claude, Bedrock, Gemini, Ollama
| Category | Google Antigravity | Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| Output Quality | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Value | 6.0 | 10.0 |
| Features | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Overall | 8.0 | 8.4 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Google Antigravity | Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Google Antigravity if...
- ✓Easier to use (8 vs 6)
Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.
Visit Google AntigravityPick Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 if...
- ✓Better value for money (10/10)
Enterprise developers on .NET or mixed Python + .NET stacks who want an MIT-licensed agent orchestration framework with real enterprise credibility. Also good for Azure Foundry customers who want first-class native integration. Teams migrating from Semantic Kernel or AutoGen should plan the move to Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 now rather than later.
Visit Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0Our Verdict
Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 edges out Google Antigravity with a 8.4 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 has the advantage in value.