Google Antigravity vs Codex (OpenAI)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Google Antigravity

A
8.0/10

Google's agent-first AI IDE -- deploys up to 5 autonomous coding agents in parallel on a VS Code fork

Powered by Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model)

Our Pick

Codex (OpenAI)

A
8.3/10

OpenAI's cloud-based coding agent -- runs parallel tasks, proposes PRs, and lives inside ChatGPT

Powered by GPT-5.3-Codex / GPT-5.4

CategoryGoogle AntigravityCodex (OpenAI)
Ease of Use8.08.0
Output Quality8.58.0
Value6.08.0
Features9.59.0
Overall8.08.3

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGoogle AntigravityCodex (OpenAI)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

GPT-5.3-Codex benchmarks — Google Antigravity has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
SWE-bench72%
HumanEval95%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Google Antigravity if...

Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.

Visit Google Antigravity

Pick Codex (OpenAI) if...

  • Better value for money (8/10)

Developers already paying for ChatGPT Plus who want a coding agent at no extra cost. Especially good for parallel task execution -- assign multiple bug fixes or feature branches and let Codex work them simultaneously.

Visit Codex (OpenAI)

Our Verdict

Codex (OpenAI) edges out Google Antigravity with a 8.3 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Codex (OpenAI) has the advantage in value.