Adobe Firefly vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Adobe Firefly

B
7.3/10

Adobe's AI image generator -- commercially safe and baked into Creative Cloud

Our Pick

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

A
8.9/10

Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model -- the best-in-class text-in-image renderer, now the default across the Gemini app

CategoryAdobe FireflyNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Ease of Use9.09.5
Output Quality7.09.5
Value6.08.5
Features7.08.0
Overall7.38.9

Pricing Comparison

FeatureAdobe FireflyNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Adobe Firefly if...

Adobe Creative Cloud subscribers who want AI generation baked into their existing workflow. Designers who need commercially safe images.

Visit Adobe Firefly

Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if...

  • Higher output quality (9.5 vs 7)
  • Better value for money (8.5/10)
  • More features (8 vs 7)

Designers, marketers, and content creators who need readable text in images (social posts, ad creative, book covers, infographics, event flyers) and who are already using or willing to pay for Gemini. If any part of your commercial design work requires typography to look right, Nano Banana 2 is the 2026 leader.

Visit Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Our Verdict

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the clear winner here with 8.9/10 vs 7.3/10. Adobe Firefly isn't bad, but Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) outperforms it across the board. Pick Adobe Firefly only if adobe creative cloud subscribers who want ai generation baked into their existing workflow.